A Couple of Quick Chuckles

A couple of links that we hope will bring a you at least a quick chuckle:



Advertisements

New York State Looking to Ban Snowblowers

Using Data to Fix the Weather


by Trevor Krebbec, staff reporter, Education Weak

In a move they say will help protect the residents, businesses, and schools of New York State from the effects of more harsh winters, officials are seeking to ban snow blowers.


The recommendation was made using the same data analysis system recently used to solve the education crisis.

Earlier, the State Education Department had looked at standardized test scores and realized that since teachers who work in schools with the population segments that tend to do most poorly on tests are less likely to be rated effective, the problem can be fixed by moving the teachers from one set of schools to another. As a spokesman said,”We looked at these groups who are far more likely to be dealing with the effects of poverty or to live in homes where English isn’t the primary language, and we said, clearly the issue here is the teachers. We can’t think of any other explanation.”

With this problem out of the way, state officials turned to the weather, another issue that, like public education, they see as “a huge drain on taxpayer money.” Analysts poured over years and years of national sales data for various products and realized that in states where snow blowers are sold, snowfall levels are much higher than in areas where they are not sold. In fact, Florida and Hawaii, two states in which snow blowers are not sold, get no snow at all. As one state official said, “We believe that by banning these items, we can drastically reduce, maybe even eliminate days lost due to snowfall. In fact, we really want to push this a step further. The plan is to confiscate all snow blowers in New York state and ship them to Southern California to help solve their drought.”

If this succeeds, the next area of focus will be medicine. One analyst said, “We created cluster maps of people suffering from various illnesses and were shocked to find an undeniable correlation between the location of hospitals and concentrations of sick people. This is a true health crisis, and it’s about time that they be held accountable. Why are we paying all this money for medical care when there are still sick people?” Plans are still in the works, but the state is looking to implement a system in which hospitals with too many sick people would lose funding and doctors and nurses who work there would be be rated ineffective.

How Far Will Field Testing Go?

State To Dramatically Increase Field Testing
by Trevor Krebbec, staff reporter, Education Weak

Based on what he called, “the tremendous popularity of our current field testing program,” New York State Commissioner of Education John King announced plans to make these tests a weekly occurrence throughout New York State public schools next year.

“Many of our vendors felt it was unfair that only Pearson is able to test their products in the school setting. We recognized this as a valid complaint, and because equity is one of our top priorities, we came up with a plan that we think will better serve all the members of this important constituency”

Texas based Paragonic, Inc., a manufacturer of school furniture, will be the first participant. On the first Friday of the 2015/16 school year, all public school students in the state will spend 90 minutes testing Paragonic’s new line of chairs, sitting down and standing up again repeatedly to evaluate the comfort, weight, and ease of movement of the chairs. Stressing how much NYSED (the New York State Education Department) cares about special ed students, Commissioner King added that students with test modifications will be given extra time, up to 3 hours of sitting down and standing up.

Parent groups have already announced plans to opt-out of these added field tests, but Commissioner King was adamant. “Why would you deny your child the opportunity to be involved in their choice of seating? I think it shows that parents who will allow their children to stand and stare for 90 minutes while other students at least get to sit down for part of the time… well, I guess they just don’t care about their kids.”

Teacher representatives disputed King’s claim that field tests are popular, but King stood his ground. “Some are claiming that we only spoke to executives at Pearson, but this is completely untrue. We spoke to middle managers, sales reps, people in accounting, and even administrative assistants. None of them oppose field testing. If anything, most felt we weren’t doing enough.” Responding to further complaints that NYSED’s actions run counter to the opinions of educators, King said, “we conducted a survey of every superintendent who has applied for a position at NYSED, and they were 100% in favor of our plans for testing – not to mention the Common Core, APPR, literally everything.”

Deputy Education Commissioner Ken Wagner acknowledged that there have been complaints, but he dismisses them, saying these people “have constantly criticized nearly everything the department has done in the last four years.” In other words, as King explained,  “We are very open to feedback, but it is NYSED policy not to accept complaints from people who complain. We want to hear from positive people, not naysayers. To put it another way, we know we’re right, so anybody who says otherwise is, by definition, wrong.”

Opponents of field testing may think they are looking out for the best interests of children, protecting them from unnecessary stress and having their instructional time needlessly wasted, but Wagner says these critics are just lazy and ignorant. “Rather than go through the difficult work, taking the time, to help people understand the need for field testing, sometimes it’s easier to say ‘I’m opting out.'”

After the chair test, subsequent field tests include Johnson & Johnson’s “Band Aid” brand (all students will have different size bandages applied and ripped off their skin to test “ouchiness”), Elmer’s glue (younger students will eat different types of paste to test for toxicity) and Epi-Pen (a single use needle used for treating severe allergic reactions).  

Previously, Epi-Pens had only been used on students who were experiencing symptoms of reactions. But according to King, this is just too small of a sample. “This is really about what’s best for all kids, and the only way we can know if these needles hurt too much – or not enough – whatever the case may be, is by testing them out on every single student.”

Some districts have indicated that they will refuse to participate, but Mr. Wagner says that’s not acceptable. “If a particular community does not participate in field testing, it’s not like the need for field testing suddenly goes away. The burden just gets shifted to their neighbors.”
Public school advocates disagree, suggesting that, ideally, all districts would refuse. However, the commissioner counters, this would be even worse, as the burden would then be pushed onto corporations. “Corporations exist to make a profit. It’s that simple. If we don’t allow them to test out their products on our students, it will cut into their bottom line, and that hardly seems fair.”

New York Board of Regents Chancellor Merryl Tisch agreed.  “As John has said, it’s all about equity. Corporate profits in this country are at an all time high and yet some firms are seeing margins that are barely out of the single digits. Have you ever been in the boardroom of a corporation that failed to meet its quarterly projections? Well I have, and its a sad, sad, sight –  one that I’d like never to see again.”

“Some point out that our mission is to serve students, but students are people and so are corporations. And while students are only with us for 12 years or so, corporations can last forever and we have to take that into account.”
Asked if this new policy contradicts his prior statements regarding the need to limit testing, the Commissioner insisted it did not. “Field testing isn’t testing. When you put a modifier in front of a word, it becomes a new thing. We can do even more. Some of our corporate friends have suggested “pre-field-testing,” “quasi-field testing,” even “enhanced field testing techniques,” really creative stuff. You can see why we’re so interested in allowing corporations full access to our public schools. As I see it there are still over a hundred days on which students aren’t taking tests. This is only the beginning,” Mr. King said. “Only the beginning.”